tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2116313492776857245.post418288648845612143..comments2012-01-29T00:39:49.226+11:00Comments on 北原の别屋: Who needs a post title?zKitahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11463026186511787567noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2116313492776857245.post-29995771458191602011-11-27T13:38:36.931+11:002011-11-27T13:38:36.931+11:00Regarding 'there seem to be quite severe conse...Regarding 'there seem to be quite severe consequences', I don't see your problem? No, it isn't 'there seems to be', it's 'there seem to be' because it's referring to 'consequences' rather than a 'consequence'. <br /><br />Regarding the second example, touché, Anonymous. I will agree that I probably should proofread comments that I type up as that was quite an embarrassing mistake. I hope you'll excuse me!YUKI.Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17798803948867156287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2116313492776857245.post-5456114735616357082011-11-27T10:23:34.616+11:002011-11-27T10:23:34.616+11:00I'm not really a participant in this conversat...I'm not really a participant in this conversation, or rather, debate, but may I point out to you, YUKI.N., that there are several grammatical errors in your little 'essay' as well? For example, in 'According to the Bible, there seem to be,' it's 'there seems to be,' and in 'wasn't aware that was how logic works,' it's 'how logic worked.' Not to mention, there are other errors in your post 'Who needs a post title?' that I cannot be bothered to pinpoint. So please, before you accuse someone else of being 'unable to recognise the difference between "has" and "have," something that I regard as elementary,' I think you should proofread your own work. Also, I suggest you read up on humility. I'm sure it'll help you too!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2116313492776857245.post-67280308787697965822011-11-26T21:30:07.283+11:002011-11-26T21:30:07.283+11:00Respect other religions, when they don't respe...Respect other religions, when they don't respect me? I hope you aren't serious. According to the Bible, there seem to be quite severe consequences for not worshipping its God (ie: hell). Their god seems awfully naive and selfish if it can't tolerate man, its supposed creation, using its brain, something which was supposedly bestowed upon it by it, to come to the logical conclusion that the Bible is bullshit. I think you get the picture - I won't even bother talking about the Bible's attitude (and the general attitude of those follow it) towards homosexuality.<br /><br />Have you heard of the burden of proof? Maybe not. Basically, without evidence, a claim is not assumed to be true. Are you familiar with Russell's Teapot? Look it up. Anyone is capable of spouting shit which is impossible to disprove - does this mean we should assume that it is true? The Bible and many of its followers believe in creationism and attempt to enforce this incorrect belief on children. Should this be tolerated? Should a religion which advocates a baseless "theory" - if we can call it that - that is hindering humanity's progress as a whole be accepted? <br /><br />There does not need to be evidence against God's existence. Again, the burden of proof. Are you saying that we need to be able to disprove God's existence for it to be assumed that it does not exist? Sorry, I wasn't aware that was how logic works! I guess your mighty "VCE education" has taught you all there is to life, eh?<br /><br />Oh my, I'm so very ignorant. I'd be honoured for you to elaborate on "what really defines reality". For the record, I don't live in Australia so no, I haven't done "VCE" but it seems that you haven't either - for example, I quote: "kid who haven't even done VCE". You are clearly unable to recognise the difference between "has" and "have", something that I regard as elementary. Perhaps your juvenile insult is merely a cover up regarding your own lack of intelligence?<br /><br />tl;dr: I suggest you read up on logic. I'm sure it'll help you!YUKI.Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17798803948867156287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2116313492776857245.post-20910221223819917032011-11-26T17:39:20.439+11:002011-11-26T17:39:20.439+11:00The bible indeed is not perfect, but the least you...The bible indeed is not perfect, but the least you can do is respect other religions. There is no evidence that proves whether God exists or not, so don't blabber on about things that deep down, none of us really understand. You're obviously just a kid who haven't even done VCE, otherwise you'd understand something about what really defines reality. So relax, look at the big picture instead of a single piece of the jigsaw, and keep an open mind as well as a mature outlook on life.Selhorsthttp://www.google.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2116313492776857245.post-25488991011283728992011-11-21T17:53:54.812+11:002011-11-21T17:53:54.812+11:00I don't particularly see myself as a masochist...I don't particularly see myself as a masochist and consequently the idea of reading hundreds of pages of that drivel does not strike me as particularly appealing. I may or may not review certain parts or gospels of the bible though. Stay tuned!YUKI.Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17798803948867156287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2116313492776857245.post-60137485047945693062011-11-15T14:06:25.405+11:002011-11-15T14:06:25.405+11:00do a review of the bibledo a review of the biblerandom guynoreply@blogger.com